🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.